Allowed

Aftab Alam v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC4 Jan 2021B.A./9403/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Jharkhand, Ranchi granted bail to the petitioner in a theft case involving a motorcycle. The court accepted the petitioner's undertaking to remove defects and cooperate with the trial, directing release upon furnishing a bail bond and providing two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail with bond of ₹25,000 and two sureties of like amount, conditioned on cooperating with the trial.

Aftab Alam Vs the State of Jharkhand — Bail and Remand | Jharkhand HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 9403 of 2020

¶2

Aftab Alam @ Prince … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party

¶3

------

¶4

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶5

For the Petitioner : Mr. M. Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Abhay Kr. Tiwari, Addl. P.P.

¶6

------

¶7

Order No.02 Dated- 04.01.2021

¶8

Heard the parties through video conferencing.

¶9

Learned counsel for the petitioner personally undertakes to remove the defects as pointed out by the stamp reporter within two weeks after the lockdown period is over.

¶10

In view of the personal undertaking of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter are ignored for the present.

¶11

The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Hariharpur P.S. Case No.53 of 2020 registered under sections 413/414/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in committing theft of a motorcycle. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner has been in custody since 10.08.2020 as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 8 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail.

¶13

The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.

¶14

Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate -1^st Class, Dhanbad, in

¶15

connection with Hariharpur P.S. Case No.53 of 2020 with the condition that he will cooperate with the trial of the case.

¶16

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )

¶17

Sonu-Gunjan/

Aftab Alam v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aftab Alam v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kiran Dhara Vs the State of Jharkhand

Oliv Lata Devi Vs the State of Jharkhand

Dinesh Kumar Gupta Vs State of Jharkhand

Kailash Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand

Birsa Surin Alias Besra Surin Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ramdas Manjhi Vs the State of Jharkhand