Allowed

Vijay Yadav v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC19 Mar 2021A.B.A./808/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners in a case alleging attempted murder. The court directed surrender within six weeks, payment of Rs.25,000 as victim compensation, and furnished specific conditions regarding cooperation with investigation and calmness.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners granted anticipatory bail with conditions including surrender, victim compensation, bail bond with sureties, and cooperation.

Vijay Yadav Vs the State of Jharkhand — Narcotics (NDPS) | Jharkhand HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.808 of 2021

¶2

------

¶3

Vijay Yadav

¶4

Sikandar Yadav

¶5

Brahmdeo Yadav

¶6

Prakash Yadav @ Prakash Kumar Yadav

¶7

Mahendra Yadav

¶8

Sahdeo Gupta

¶9

Radhik Yadav

¶10

.... .... …. Petitioners

¶11

Versus

¶12

The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party

¶13

------

¶14

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶15

------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Sushant Kr. Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pradeep Kr. Verma, Addl.P.P For the Informant : Mr. Rajesh Kr. Singh, Advocate

¶16

Order No.02 Dated- 19.03.2021

¶17

Heard the parties through video conferencing.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter within two weeks after the lockdown is over.

¶19

In view of personal undertaking given by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter are ignored for the present.

¶20

Apprehending their arrest in connection with Mayurhand P.S. Case No.64 of 2020 instituted under Sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 325, 504 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail.

¶21

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that they attempted to murder Prakash Yadav, Narendra Kumar, Soma Devi and Ajay Yadav. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. It is next submitted that for the self-same occurrence, from the side of the petitioners, Mayurhand P.S. Case No.64 of 2020 has also been instituted. It is then submitted that the petitioners undertake that they will not disturb or annoy the informant or any of his family members in any manner during the pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners are ready and willing to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to jointly pay ad interim victim compensation of Rs.25,000/- without

¶22

prejudice to their defence in this case in favour of the informant. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privileges of anticipatory bail.

¶23

Learned Addl.P.P appearing for the State being assisted by the learned counsel for the informant oppose the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

¶24

Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chatra within six weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrendering, the petitioners will be enlarged on bail on jointly depositing a demand draft of Rs.25,000/- as ad interim victim compensation without prejudice to their defence in this case drawn in favour of the informant and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chatra in connection with Mayurhand P.S. Case No.64 of 2020 with the condition that they will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the pendency of the case and they will not disturb or annoy the informant or any of his family members in any manner during the pendency of the case and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶25

In case the petitioners deposit the said demand draft, the court below is directed to issue notice to the informant and on his proper identification, the court below shall handover the same to him forthwith.

¶26

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )

¶27

Animesh/

Vijay Yadav v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay Yadav v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prabhash Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ashok Prasad Bhagat Vs the State of Jharkhand

MD Samim Alias MD Samim Qureshi Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ashutosh Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Prem Pandit Vs the State of Jharkhand

Maulvi Baitulla Alias MD Baitulla Alias Baitulla Vs the State of Jharkhand