Allowed

Vijay Kumar Pandey v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC5 Oct 2021A.B.A./7459/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Jharkhand, considering the petitioner's undertaking to remove stamp defects and lack of criminal antecedent, granted anticipatory bail. The petitioner was directed to surrender within six weeks and deposit security under specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted; petitioner directed to surrender within six weeks and deposit Rs.20,000 cash security and furnish a bail bond of Rs.25,000 with two sureties.

Vijay Kumar Pandey Vs the State of Jharkhand — Narcotics (NDPS) | Jharkhand HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.7459 of 2021

¶2

------

¶3

Vijay Kumar Pandey .... .... …. Petitioner

¶4

Versus

¶5

The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party

¶6

------

¶7

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶8

For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vishwanath Roy, Addl.P.P

¶9

Order No.02 Dated- 05.10.2021

¶10

Heard the parties.

¶11

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter within two weeks after the lockdown is over.

¶12

In view of personal undertaking given by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter are ignored for the present.

¶13

Apprehending his arrest in connection with Siyaljori P.S. Case No.23 of 2021 instituted under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail.

¶14

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was the cleaner of a Hywa vehicle which was found loaded with fifty pieces of stolen Idler Conveyor. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-15 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail.

¶15

Learned Addl.P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶16

Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court of learned J.M.-1^st Class-cum Addl. Civil Judge (Jr. Div.), Bokaro within

¶17

six weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.20,000/-(Rupees twenty thousand) as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-1^st Class-cum Addl. Civil Judge (Jr. Div.), Bokaro in connection with Siyaljori P.S. Case No.23 of 2021 with the condition that he will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶18

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )

¶19

Animesh/

Vijay Kumar Pandey v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay Kumar Pandey v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

MD Wasim Vs the State of Jharkhand

Rohit Kandhwe Alias Rohit Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Manoranjan Pandey Vs the State of Jharkhand

Mustak Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand

Sarabjit Singh Suri Alias Sarabjit Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand

Pinki Kumari Alias Pinki Devi Vs States of Jharkhand