Allowed

Niranjan Kumar Yadav Alias Niranjan Yadav v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC30 Sept 2021A.B.A./7383/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Jharkhand granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case concerning illegal excavation and transportation of sand, subject to furnishing security and cooperation with the investigation.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted subject to furnishing cash security of Rs. 15,000/-, bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- with two sureties, and conditions to cooperate with investigation and appear when noticed.

Niranjan Kumar Yadav Alias Niranjan Yadav Vs the State of… — Cheque Dishonour | Jharkhand HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B. A. No. 7383 of 2021

¶2

Niranjan Kumar Yadav @ Niranjan Yadav

¶3

… Petitioner

¶4

Versus

¶5

The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party

¶6

Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶7

For the Petitioner : Mr. Aashish Kumar ,Adv. For the State : Mr. Prabir Kr. Chatterjee, Spl. P.P.

¶8

02 / 30.09.2021 Heard the parties through Video Conferencing.

¶9

Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Godda (M) P.S. Case No. 271 of 2021 registered under Sections 379, 411 of the Indian Penal Code, Rule 4/ 54 of the JMMC Rules, 2004 and Rules 9/13 of Jharkhand Minerals (Prevention of illegal Mining, Transportation & storage) Rules, 2017.

¶10

The Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is the owner of the tractor which was seized by police while transporting illegally excavated sand. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is then submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to furnish sufficient security including cash security and undertakes to cooperate with the investigation of the case hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.

¶11

The learned Spl. PP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶12

Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Hence, in the event of arrest by the police or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, the petitioner shall

¶13

be released on bail on furnishing cash security of Rs. 15,000/- and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Godda in connection with Godda (M) P.S. Case No. 271 of 2021 subject to the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the Investigation of the case and will appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will submit mobile number and photocopy of Aadhaar card at the time of surrender in the court below with an undertaking not to change mobile number during the pendency of the case along with the other conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.

¶14

( ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)

¶15

Smita/-

Niranjan Kumar Yadav Alias Niranjan Yadav v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Niranjan Kumar Yadav Alias Niranjan Yadav v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prakash Pandit Vs the State of Jharkhand

Rajesh Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand

MD Jahid Khan Alias Zahid Khan Vs the State of Jharkhand

Deorath Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Narendra Kumar Ganatra Vs the State of Jharkhand

Prakash Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand