Allowed

Neeraj Kumar Verma v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC29 Sept 2021A.B.A./7253/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving illegal transportation of stolen sand. The court accepted the petitioner's undertaking to remove stamp defects and directed surrender with cash security and bail bond conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted with direction to surrender within six weeks, deposit Rs. 5,000 cash security, and furnish Rs. 25,000 bail bond with two sureties under Section 438 CrPC.

Neeraj Kumar Verma Vs the State of Jharkhand — Cheque Dishonour | Jharkhand HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.7253 of 2021

¶2

------

¶3

Neeraj Kumar Verma .... .... …. Petitioner

¶4

Versus

¶5

The State of Jharkhand .... .... ....Opposite Party

¶6

------

¶7

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶8

For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kr. Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. P.K. Chatterjee, Spl.P.P

¶9

Order No.03 Dated- 29.09.2021

¶10

Heard the parties through video conferencing.

¶11

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter within two weeks after the lockdown is over.

¶12

In view of personal undertaking given by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter are ignored for the present.

¶13

Apprehending his arrest in connection with Chouparan P.S. Case No. 257 of 2021 instituted under Sections 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 54 of JMMC Rules, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail.

¶14

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is owner and driver of the tractor bearing Registration No.JH-02AZ-7132 was involved in transportation of stolen sand illegally. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-11 of the instant anticipatory bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail.

¶15

Learned Spl.P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶16

Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court within six weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or

¶17

surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.5,000/-(Rupees five thousand) as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.1^st Class, Hazaribag in connection with Chouparan P.S. Case No. 257 of 2021 with the condition that he will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶18

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )

¶19

Pappu/

Neeraj Kumar Verma v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Neeraj Kumar Verma v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjay Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Pushplata Alias Pushpalata Kumari Vs the State of Jharkhand

Laxman Ravidas Alias Laxman Das Vs the State of Jharkhand

Amar Mahto Vs the State of Jharkhand

Alauddin Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand

Sidhi Pandey Alias Sidhi Nath Pandey Vs the State of Jharkhand