Allowed

Shamim Ansari v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC27 Sept 2021A.B.A./7213/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Jharkhand granted anticipatory bail to five petitioners facing charges under the IPC and IT Act for cyber fraud and cheque bouncing. The Court ordered their release on depositing specified cash and furnishing a bond with sureties upon arrest or surrender within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted upon deposit of Rs.15,000 cash and furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000 with two sureties each, to be executed if arrested or surrender within six weeks.

Shamim Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand — Cheque Dishonour | Jharkhand HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 7213 of 2021

¶2

Shamim Ansari

¶3

Md. Safruddin Ansari @ Sarfuddin Ansari

¶4

Ahmad Hussain

¶5

Asgar Ansari

¶6

Arif Ansari

¶7

Samsul Ansari … Petitioners Versus

¶8

The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------

¶9

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶10

For the Petitioners : Mr. R.S. Mazumdar, Sr. Advocate For the State : None

¶11

------

¶12

Order No.02 Dated- 27.09.2021

¶13

Heard the parties through video conferencing.

¶14

Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.62 of 2021, registered under sections 419/420/467/468/ 471/120B of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 66(B)/ 66(C)/ 66(D)/ 84(C) of the I.T. Act.

¶15

The learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that they along with co-accused persons of the case are impersonating themselves as bank officers and after obtaining information about the details of A.T.M. cards of the account holders of bank, they were swindling away money from their bank accounts. The learned Senior Advocate, further, submits that neither anything has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners nor they were present at the place of occurrence. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false and the petitioners have no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no.18 of the instant anticipatory bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioners are ready and willing to furnish sufficient security including cash security and undertake to

¶16

cooperate with the investigation of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.

¶17

Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the above named petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, they shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs.15,000/- each and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge –II, Deoghar, in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.62 of 2021 with the condition that the petitioners will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish their mobile number and a copy of their Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.

¶18

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )

¶19

Sonu/Gunjan-

Shamim Ansari v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shamim Ansari v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pradeep Sharma Vs the State of Jharkhand

Bipin Deo Sinha Vs the State of Jharkhand

MD Mukhtar Alias Gajni Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand

Pankaj Choudhari Alias Pankaj Kr Chaudhary Vs the State of Jharkhand

Naresh Verma Alias Naresh Kumar Verma Vs the State of Jharkhand

Abhay Kumar Alias Golu Vs the State of Jharkhand