Mr. Niraj Kumar, appearing for Narcotic Control Bureau on the other hand vehemently opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and drawing attention of this Court towards page nos.31,38 and 41 of the counter affidavit filed by Narcotic Control Bureau in this case, submits that therein Call Details Report between the petitioner and the co-accused-Arvind Ray, coaccused-Santosh Kumar Yadav and the co-accused-Chandan Kumar Singh have been mentioned in detail and the same goes to show the complicity of the petitioner in the offences involved in the case and also goes to show that since the petitioner is involved in racket of transportation of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, hence, there is every chance of the petitioner being involved in similar offences, if released on bail and since the seized article comes under commercial quantity, hence, rigors of section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act,1985 is attracted in this case therefore in the absence of any material to show that the allegations against the petitioner are false and that he will not indulge in any offence while on bail the petitioner ought not to be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. It is then submitted that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is required during the investigation of the case to find out the chain of supply of the narcotic drugs. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner ought not to be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.
