Patellar court granted the petitioner permission to withdraw an anticipatory bail application. Consequently, the application was dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the application was allowed; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B. A. No. 6028 of 2021
Md. Hadees @ Mohmmad Hadish … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… Opposite Party
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Kumar ,Adv. For the State : Ms. Vandana Bharti,Addl. P.P.
03 / 06.10.2021 Heard the parties through video conferencing.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner
seeks permission of the court to withdraw this application.
Prayer is allowed.
Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.
( ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Smita/-
Md. Hadees @ Mohmmad Hadish
The State of Jharkhand
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
