Allowed

Mohan Lal Bagri v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC2 Sept 2021A.B.A./3922/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this matter involving domestic violence, the High Court of Jharkhand granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with a criminal case citing dowry demands and cruelty. The bail was conditioned on the deposit of an interim victim compensation amount and furnishing of a bail bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Grant of anticipatory bail upon depositing Rs. 2,00,000 as interim victim compensation and furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties.

Mohan Lal Bagri Vs the State of Jharkhand — Domestic Violence | Jharkhand HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3922 of 2021

¶2

Mohan Lal Bagri … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Anr. … Opposite Parties

¶3

------

¶4

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶5

For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kr. Choudhary, Advocate : Mr. Rohit Agarwal, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Snehlika Bhagat, Addl. P.P. For O.P. No.2 : Mr. Niranjan Kumar, Advocate ------

¶6

Order No.03 Dated- 02.09.2021

¶7

Heard the parties through video conferencing.

¶8

Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Chandil P.S. Case No.26 of 2021 registered under sections 323/341/504/506/34/498A of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 3/4 of D.P. Act.

¶9

The Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has treated his wife with cruelty in connection with demand of dowry. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and are general and omnibus in nature. It is then submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to pay Rs. 2,00,000/- as ad interim victim compensation to the informant without prejudice to his defence in this case and undertakes to cooperate with the investigation of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.

¶10

Learned Addl. P.P. and the learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.

¶11

Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the above named petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four months from the date of this order, he shall be released on bail

¶12

on depositing a demand draft of Rs. 2,00,000/- as ad interim victim compensation in favour of informant and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Seraikella, in connection with Chandil P.S. Case No.26 of 2021 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.

¶13

In case, the petitioner deposits the ad interim victim compensation amount, the court below is directed to issue notice to the informant and hand over the said demand draft to her, after proper identification.

¶14

In case, the petitioner deposits the ad interim victim compensation, the same shall be adjusted towards maintenance and one time settlement if and when the same takes place between the parties.

¶15

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )

¶16

Sonu/Gunjan-

Mohan Lal Bagri v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohan Lal Bagri v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Samaul Ansari Alias Imamul Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand

Chandan Prakash Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ritesh Mittal Vs the State of Jharkhand

Suresh Yadav Vs the State of Jharkhand

Om Prakash Rajak Vs the State of Jharkhand

Nakul Mahato Vs the State of Jharkhand