Petitioner Mithilesh Murmu sought permission to withdraw a filed bail application. The High Court of Jharkhand allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the application, with no substantive issues addressed on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1808 of 2021
Mithilesh Murmu @ Mithilesh Mandal
… Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Tarun Kumar No.1, Advocate For the State : Mr. S.K. Tiwari, Spl. P.P.
------
Order No.03 Dated- 03.03.2021
Heard the parties through video conferencing. After some argument, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this bail application.
Accordingly, this bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )
Sonu-Gunjan/
Mithilesh Murmu @ Mithilesh Mandal
The State of Jharkhand
Anil Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
