Allowed

Ganesh Ganjhu v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC23 Feb 2021B.A./1557/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge order granting bail to the petitioner in an N.D.P.S. case involving illegal possession of 22 kg of doda. The court postponed defect removal pending the lockdown lift, accepted the undertaking to cooperate with trial, and directed release on a bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on bail by furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of similar amounts.

Ganesh Ganjhu Vs the State of Jharkhand — Narcotics (NDPS) | Jharkhand HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1557 of 2021

¶2

Ganesh Ganjhu @ Ganeshi Ganjhu … Petitioner Versus

¶3

The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party

¶4

------

¶5

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶6

------ For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Chaturvedy, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ravi Prakash, Spl. P.P. ------

¶7

Order No.02 Dated- 23.02.2021

¶8

Heard the parties through video conferencing.

¶9

Learned counsel for the petitioner personally undertakes to remove the defects as pointed out by the stamp reporter within two weeks after the lockdown period is over.

¶10

In view of the personal undertaking of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter are ignored for the present.

¶11

The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Bashistha Nagar P.S. Case No.75 of 2020 (N.D.P.S. Case No.83 of 2020) registered under sections 15 (C) of NDPS Act.

¶12

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was in illegal possession of 22 kg of doda . It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the seized doda is less than commercial quantity. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 16.09.2020 as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 15 of the bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail.

¶13

The learned Spl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.

¶14

Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

¶15

satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge (N.D.P.S.), Chatra, in connection with Bashistha Nagar P.S. Case No.75 of 2020 (N.D.P.S. Case No.83 of 2020) with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case.

¶16

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )

¶17

Sonu-Gunjan/

Ganesh Ganjhu v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ganesh Ganjhu v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Habul Khan Alias Haibul Khan Vs the State of Jharkhand

Sujeet Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Gajo Mandi Alias Gajoram Mandi Alias Gajo Mardi Vs the State of Jharkhand

Amit Sharma Alias Sonu Sharma Vs the State of Jharkhand

MD Zeeshan Alias Jishu Alias Mohammad Zeeshan Vs the State of Jharkhand

Saquib Imeteyaz Alias Samir Alias Saqib Imteyaz Vs the State of Jharkhand