Dismissed

Madam Mohan Mishra Alias M M Mishra v. Steel Authority Of India Limited Bokaro Steel Plant And Anr.

Jharkhand HC4 Jun 2020WPC/4603/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This High Court of Jharkhand disposed of a writ petition challenging an appellate court's order and a rejection of an eviction application. The court noted a similar petition was already disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioner to pursue pending litigation.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted liberty to pursue the pending appeal before the appellate court and raise all available points.

Madam Mohan Mishra Alias M M Mishra Vs Steel Authority… — Property and Title | Jharkhand HC (2020)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶3

W.P.(C) No. 4603 of 2017

¶4

Madan Mohan Mishra @ M.M.Mishra …Petitioner

¶5

-V e r s u s-

¶6

Steel Authority of India Limited/Bokaro Steel Plant, B.S. City, Bokaro

¶7

Hindustan Steel Works Construction Limited, B.S. City, Bokaro

¶8

...Respondents

¶9

CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR

¶10

For the Petitioner:- Mr. Abhay Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the SAIL :- Mr. Gaurav Abhishek, J.C. to Mr. Rajeev Ranjan, Sr. Advocate

¶11

Order No.-06 Dated: 04.06.2020

¶12

The present case is taken up through Audio/Video conferencing. 2. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 19.05.2017 (Annexure-1 to the writ petition) passed by the Principal District Judge, Bokaro in Civil (Misc.) Appeal No. 02 of 2017 whereby the said appeal preferred by the petitioner has been dismissed and the order dated 18.01.2017 passed by the Estate officer, Bokaro Steel City, Bokaro in A.E. Case No. 66 of 2014 rejecting the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 8 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 to call for different documents relating to lease and seeking certain information regarding allotment of all the quarters of Hindustan Steel Works Construction Limited (HSCL) as well as its rent being paid by other persons, has been upheld.

¶13

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, submits that similar writ petition i.e. W.P.(C) No. 4600 of 2017 (Rikta Ganguli Vs. Steel Authority of India Limited/Bokaro Steel Plant, Bokaro & Anr.) has already been disposed of by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 28.09.2019.

¶14

4. Perused the order dated 28.09.2019 passed by this Court in the aforesaid writ petition, the relevant paragraph of which reads as under:

¶15

“In view thereof and taking into consideration the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of according liberty to the petitioner that if the appeal is still pending, the petitioner shall pursue the same agitating the point which has been agitated by him before this Court”.

¶16

¶17

5. Mr. Gaurav Abhishek, J.C. to Mr. Rajeev Ranjan, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-SAIL, accepts the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that W.P.(C) No. 4600 of 2017 in which similar prayer was made, has already been disposed of by this Court.

¶18

6. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent-SAIL, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to pursue the appeal before the appellate court if the same is pending by now and to raise all available points with him.

¶19

(Rajesh Shankar, J.)

¶20

Ritesh/

Madam Mohan Mishra Alias M M Mishra v. Steel Authority Of India Limited Bokaro Steel Plant And Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Madam Mohan Mishra Alias M M Mishra v. Steel Authority Of India Limited Bokaro Steel Plant And Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Janki Devi Vs Anil Singh

Parvati Devi Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ranchi Finance Company Pvt. Ltd. through Its Authorized Signatory Namely Lokesh Kejriwal Vs Reserve Bank of India through Its Regional Director

Dilip Kumar Jha Vs Steel Authority Of India Limited Bokaro Steel Plant And Anr.

Manoj Kumar Nanda Vs Steel Authority Of India Limited Bokaro Steel Plant And Anr.

Ajay Kumar Singh Vs Steel Authority Of India Limited Bokaro Steel Plant And Anr.