Criminal writ application withdrawn by petitioner. Permission granted. Application dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission allowing withdrawal granted; Criminal writ application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (Cr.) No. 90 of 2020
Rajeev Singh Dugal…..…....... Petitioner(s)
Versus
The State of Jharkhand & Ors……….. Respondent(s)
Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ananda Sen
Through:-Video Conferencing
…… For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Kr. Sah, Advocate For the State : Mr. Mukesh Kr. Sinha, Sr. SC-I
2/06.10.2020 Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to deposit the deficit court fees within two weeks from today, if not already deposited. Rest of the defects stand ignored for the present.
Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this criminal writ application.
Prayer is allowed.
Let this criminal writ application be dismissed as withdrawn.
( Ananda Sen, J )
Mukund/-cp.3
Rajeev Singh Dugal
The State of Jharkhand
Ananda Sen
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
