Petitioners moving for bail were subsequently released from custody. The High Court, in a one-line order, dismissed the writ application as infructuous without detailed reasoning.
The writ application was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(Cr.) No. 286 of 2017
----
-versus-
… Respondents
----
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING
----
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajendra Prasad Gupta, Advocate For the State: Mr. Abhijeet Kumar, A.C. to G.A. III
----
Considering the above submission made by the counsel for the petitioners, this writ application is dismissed as infructuous.
(Ananda Sen, J.)
Kumar/Cp-03
Sao Bari @ Sahu Bari
Kundiya Bari @ Pepandi
Bishnu Kurli
Shyam Jojo
The State of Jharkhand
The Secretary, Department of Home, Govt. of Jharkhand
Ananda Sen
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
