The petitioner submitted that the writ became infructuous and sought to withdraw it. The High Court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (Cr.) No.231 of 2015
----
Daliya Chakraborty
… Petitioner
-versus-
… Respondents
----
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashim Kumar Sahani, Advocate For the State-Respondents: Mr. Rohit, A.C. to A.A.G.I
----
7/ 09.12.2020 Mr. Ashim Kumar Sahani, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that final form has already been submitted and thus, this writ application has become infructuous. He seeks permission to withdraw this writ application.
Permission, as sought for, is granted. This writ application is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
(Ananda Sen, J.)
Kumar/Cp-03
Daliya Chakraborty
The State of Jharkhand
Superintendent of Police, Ramgarh
Officer-in-Charge, Ramgarh
Smt. Anita Goswami
Sidharth Kumar Goswami
Ananda Sen
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
