This judgment disposed of a writ petition where the petitioner submitted that relief was already granted via FIR registration. The High Court dismissed the writ application as infructuous without detailed reasoning.
Application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (Cr.) No. 204 of 2017
----
Chunni Ram Mahto … Petitioner -versus-
… Respondents
----
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING
----
For the Petitioner : Mr. Mokhtar Khan, Advocate For the State: Mr. Abhijeet Kumar, A.C. to G.A.III ----
6/ 09.12.2020 Mr. Mokhtar Khan, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, submits that the relief, as sought for in this writ application, has already been granted as the First Information Report has already been registered.
Considering the aforesaid submission, this writ application is dismissed as infructuous.
(Ananda Sen, J.)
Kumar/Cp-03
Chunni Ram Mahto
The State of Jharkhand
Shakti Ram Karan
Rajesh Kumar Goswami
Mangal Goud
Santosh Singh
Ananda Sen
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
