Contempt application withdrawn by the petitioner. Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the application accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. Case (Civil) No. 383 of 2019
Panchanan Prasad Ray & Ors. … … … …Petitioners - Versus -
The State of Jharkhand & Ors. … … … …Opp. Parties ---------
CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. S.N.PATHAK
(Through: Video Conferencing)
For the Petitioner : Mr. Debarsi Mondal, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Varun Prabhakhar, A.C. to G.P. III.
05/14.09.2020 In view of outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic, case has been taken up through Video Conferencing. Concerned lawyers have no objection with regard to the proceeding, which has been held through Video Conferencing today at 10:30 A.M. onwards. They have no complaint in respect to the audio and video clarity and quality.
At the very outset, learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this Contempt Application.
Mr. Varun Prabhakhar, A.C. to G.P. III has no object to the said withdrawal. Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, this Contempt Application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Dr. S.N. Pathak, J.)
P.K.S.
Panchanan Prasad Ray & Ors.
The State of Jharkhand & Ors.
Dr. S.N. Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
