Allowed

Ramnarayan Gope v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC5 Nov 2020A.B.A./5595/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an anticipatory bail application, the High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to the petitioner subject to furnishing security and conditions including cooperation with investigation and appearance before the Investigating Officer.

What did the court decide?

Privilege of anticipatory bail granted subject to surrender within six weeks, furnishing security, and conditions of cooperation.

Ramnarayan Gope Vs the State of Jharkhand — Anticipatory Bail | Jharkhand HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶2

A.B. A. No. 5595 of 2020

¶3

Ramnarayan Gope … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party

¶4

Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶5

For the Petitioner : Mr. K.S. Nanda, Adv. For the State : Mr. S. Roy , Addl. P.P.

¶6

02 / 05.11.2020 Heard the parties through Video Conferencing.

¶7

Mr. K.S. Nanda, learned counsel for the petitioner personally undertakes to remove the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within two weeks after the lockdown is over.

¶8

In view of the personal undertaking given by learned counsel for the petitioner the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter are ignored for the present.

¶9

Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Basia P.S. case no. 70 of 2020 registered under Sections 379, 411, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶10

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he is the owner cum driver of the tractor and the allegations against the petitioner that his vehicle was seized by police for transporting the illegally excavated sand, are all false. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 14 of the anticipatory bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner is ready to co-operate with the investigation of the case and is also ready and willing to furnish sufficient security including cash security, hence, the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.

¶11

The learned Addl. PP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶12

Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Hence, in the event of arrest by the police or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, the petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing cash security of Rs. 5,000/- and furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM, Gumla in connection with Basia P.S. case no. 70 of 2020 subject to the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the Investigation of the case and will appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will submit mobile number and photocopy of Aadhaar card at the time of surrender in the court below with an undertaking not to change mobile number during the pendency of the case along with the other conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.

¶13

( ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)

¶14

Smita/-

Ramnarayan Gope v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramnarayan Gope v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hari Narayan Rai Vs State Through Cbi

Ashok Mahto Vs the State of Jharkhand

Sugni Kumari Alias Devi Vs the State of Jharkhand

Suresh Kumar Bhalotia Vs the State of Jharkhand

Arvind Yadav Alias Arvind Kumar Yadav Vs the State of Jharkhand

Tileshwar Yadav Alias Tileshwar Gope Vs the State of Jharkhand