Allowed

Sahdeo Yadav v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC13 Oct 2020A.B.A./4906/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants anticipatory bail to petitioners facing charges of unlawful assembly and attempted murder. The court approved conditions including interim victim compensation, a bail bond, and surrender within six weeks upon arrest.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted subject to deposit of Rs. 30,000 as interim compensation, bail bond of Rs. 25,000 each with two sureties, surrender within six weeks, and compliance with investigation.

Sahdeo Yadav Vs the State of Jharkhand — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Jharkhand HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4906 of 2020

¶2

Sahdeo Yadav

¶3

Ranjeet Yadav @ Ranjeet Kr. Yadav … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party

¶4

------

¶5

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶6

For the Petitioner : Mr. Saroj Prasad, Advocate For the State : Mr. S.P. Jha, Addl. P.P. ------

¶7

Order No.02 Dated- 13.10.2020

¶8

Heard the parties through video conferencing.

¶9

Learned counsel for the petitioners personally undertakes to remove the defects as pointed out by the stamp reporter within two weeks after the lockdown period is over.

¶10

In view of the personal undertaking of the learned counsel for the petitioners, the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter are ignored for the present.

¶11

Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Barhi P.S. Case No.93 of 2020 registered under sections 147/148/149/341/323/324/325/307/379/452/427/504/506 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

The Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners were member of an unlawful assembly and being armed with deadly weapons attempted to murder the Lajwanti Devi, Suwanti Devi, Sukhdeo Yadav, Kaushalya Devi, Lilawati Devi and Sangeeta Devi and caused injuries to them. It is further submitted that the allegation against the petitioners are all false and there is land dispute between the parties. It is next submitted that for the selfsame occurrence, from the side of the petitioners, the petitioner no.1 lodged an FIR basing upon which Barhi P.S. Case No.95 of 2020 has been registered. It is then submitted that the petitioners are ready and willing to jointly pay Rs. 30,000/- as ad interim victim compensation to the informant without prejudice to their defence in this case and undertake to cooperate with the

¶13

investigation of the case and also undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.

¶14

Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.

¶15

Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the above named petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, they shall be released on bail on jointly depositing a demand draft of Rs.30,000/- as ad interim victim compensation in favour of informant and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1^st Class, Hazaribag, in connection with Barhi P.S. Case No.93 of 2020 with the condition that the petitioners will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish their mobile numbers and a copy of their Aadhar Cards in the court below with the undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the pendency of the case with further condition that they will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.

¶16

In case, the petitioners deposit the ad interim victim compensation amount, the court below is directed to issue notice to the informant and hand over the said demand draft to him, after proper identification.

¶17

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )

¶18

Sonu/Gunjan-

Sahdeo Yadav v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sahdeo Yadav v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Surendra Ram Vs the State of Jharkhand

Akhlesh Kumar Yadav Alias Akhilesh Yadav Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ranjit Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Mukesh Kumar Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand

MD Irshad Ahmad Vs the State of Jharkhand

Firoz Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand