An application for anticipatory bail filed by Pramod Pandit was rejected because the learned counsel for the petitioner did not press the application after the petitioner had already been arrested.
Anticipatory bail application rejected as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4676 of 2020
Pramod Pandit … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Prashant Kr. Rai, Advocate For the State : Mr. V.S. Sahay, Addl. P.P.
------
Order No.02 Dated- 07.10.2020
Heard the parties through video conferencing.
The learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press this anticipatory bail application, since the petitioner has already been arrested.
Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is rejected as not pressed.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )
Sonu/Gunjan-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an anticipatory bail application can be pressed after the petitioner has already been arrested.
Pramod Pandit
The State of Jharkhand
Anil Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
