Petitioner sought withdrawal of the instant application which was subsequent evidenced supported without controversy the matter was heard agreed and dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No.4608 of 2020
Abhishek Kumar Ray @ Lebra, aged about 17 years, son of Kuldip Ray, resident of Qr. No.2118, Sector 12/D, P.O. and P.S. Sector-12, B.S. City, District Bokaro. … … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand ……Opposite Party
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
------For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Naveen Kr. Ganjhu, APP ----------------------------
02 / Dated 03rd October, 2020
The matter has been heard through video conferencing. There is
no complaint about audio and visual connectivity.
Mr. Rajesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner after some
argument has prayed to withdraw the instant application .
Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has got no objection to
such submission.
In view thereof, the instant application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
Saurabh
Abhishek Kumar Ray @ Lebra
The State of Jharkhand
Sujit Narayan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
