In an anticipatory bail application, the petitioner sought permission to withdraw. The court allowed the prayer and dismissed the application accordingly.
Permission to withdraw the application allowed; application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B. A. No. 25 of 2020
Sadanand Pandit & Ors. … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sudhansu Kr. Deo, Adv. For the State : Addl. P.P.
03 / 25.02.2020 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission of the court to withdraw this application.
Prayer is allowed.
Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.
( ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Smita/-
Sadanand Pandit & Ors.
The State of Jharkhand
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
