Allowed

Nasruddin Ansari Alias MD Nasruddin Mian v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC4 Mar 2020A.B.A./1054/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners approached the High Court of Jharkhand for anticipatory bail in a forest case alleging construction on rented land. The court, considering the readiness to furnish security and the specific conditions offered, granted anticipatory bail.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners granted privilege of anticipatory bail, release on production of cash security of Rs. 10,000 each and bail bond of Rs. 25,000 each with two sureties, and undertaking not to enter forest la

Nasruddin Ansari Alias MD Nasruddin Mian… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Jharkhand HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶2

A.B. A. No. 1054 of 2020

¶3

Nasiruddin Ansari @ Md. Nasruddin Mian

¶4

Furkan Ansari … Petitioners

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party

¶7

Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶8

For the Petitioner : Mr. P.C. Sinha, Adv. For the State : Addl. P.P.

¶9

03 / 04.03.2020 Heard the parties.

¶10

Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with complaint (forest) case no. 2121 of 2018 registered under Sections 33(i) (c)/ 66 (A) /63 of the Indian Forest Act.

¶11

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that they have constructed the asbestos roofed room over the forest land. It is then submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false and one Suron Soren gave the place of occurrence land to the petitioners on rent on which, the petitioners were running a shop of motorcycle repairing. It is next submitted that the petitioners are ready and willing to furnish sufficient security including cash security and they undertake not to enter into any forest land during pendency of the case hence, the petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.

¶12

The learned Addl. PP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

¶13

Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Hence, in the event of arrest by the police or surrender within a period of four weeks from the date of this order, the petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing cash security of

¶14

Rs. 10,000/- each and furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M., 1^st class, Giridih in connection with complaint (forest) case no. 2121 of 2018 subject to the condition that the petitioner will not enter into any forest land during pendency of the case along with the other conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.

¶15

( ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)

¶16

Smita/-

Nasruddin Ansari Alias MD Nasruddin Mian v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nasruddin Ansari Alias MD Nasruddin Mian v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanghmitra Bose Vs the State of Jharkhand

Dharmendra Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Rinki Raj Mittal Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ashutosh Mahto Vs the State of Jharkhand

Sandeep Kumar Kandhwe Vs the State of Jharkhand

Balmukund Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand