Writ petition filed by Sheo Narayan Singh under Article 226 of the Constitution. Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition, which was granted by the Single Judge.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition is granted, and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(C) No. 92 of 2013
Sheo Narayan Singh.
.... . Petitioner
Versus
...Respondents
Coram: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
---For the Petitioner : Mr. Yogesh Modi, Advocate For the State : A.C. to S.C. I
09/19.8.2019 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition.
Permission, as sought for, is granted.
This writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J)
Rakesh/-
Sheo Narayan Singh
State of Jharkhand through Secretary cum Excise Commissioner, Department of Excise and Prohibition, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
