Petitioner withdrew the writ petition by submission that the matter has become infructuous. The High Court dismissed the petition as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(C) No. 6090 of 2016
Dilip Kumar Gupta, Son of – Late Mahabir Saw, Resident ofBhatti Mohalla, P.O.- Japla, P.S.- Hussainabad District Palamu
… … Petitioner
Versus
… … Respondents ---
CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
--For the Petitioner : Mr. Mitul Kumar, Advocate : For the Respondents
05 /11.04.2019 Counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant writ petition has become infructuous and accordingly, he does not want to press it.
2. Considering the submission made, this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.)
Pankaj
Dilip Kumar Gupta
Union of India
Anubha Rawat Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
