The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. The High Court granted permission and dismissed the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (S) No.5495 of 2017
Satyapal Sharma. … …Petitioner
-Versus-
The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organization, P.O. and P.S. Mango, Town-Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum & Ors. … …Respondents
CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. S.N.PATHAK
For the Petitioner :Mr. Shankar Lal Agarwal, Advocate. For the Res. 1 & 2 :Mr. D.K.Malityar, Advocate.
08/ 14.06.2019 Learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this
writ petition.
Permission, as sought for, is granted.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
P.K.S.
Satyapal Sharma
The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organization
S.N.PATHAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
