The writ petition was dismissed for being filed in a belated stage without substantive engagement or reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 2005 of 2011
Nilkanth Bauri …… Petitioner
Versus
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH For the Petitioner: M/s Mahesh Tewari, Ganesh Pathak, Advocates
For the Respondent:ECL-Mr. Rajesh Lala, Advocate
3/Dated: 28/11/2019
The sole petitioner has filed this writ petition invoking jurisdiction under Article
226 of the Constitution of India, relief prayed for, in para 1 of the writ petition.
It appears that this writ petition has been filed in a belated stage, accordingly, this
writ petition is dismissed.
(Anant Bijay Singh, J.)
Satyarthi/-
Nilkanth Bauri
M/s Eastern Coalfields Limited
Anant Bijay Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
