Dismissed
Ramu Mahto v. Shaikat Mahto And Ors.
Jharkhand HCMA/52/2003
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed an appeal for default as the appellant did not appear despite repeated calls.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
¶2
M.A. No.52 of 2003
¶3
------ Ramu Mahto .... .... …. Appellant Versus Shaikat Mahto & Others .... .... .... Respondents -----CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
¶4
------ For the Appellant : None For the Respondents : Mr. Sarju Prasad, Advocate ------
¶5
Order No.22 Dated- 04.01.2019
¶6
No one turns up on behalf of the appellant in spite of repeated calls.
¶7
This appeal is dismissed for default of the appellant.
¶8
Animesh/
¶9
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Ramu Mahto
- respondent
Shaikat Mahto
- respondent
Others
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Jharkhand HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- MA/52/2003
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court