This first appeal was dismissed for lack of prosecution as the appellant failed to appear despite repeated summons. No substantive legal proposition is established.
First appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
F. A. No. 949 of 2006
G.M. West Bokaro Colliery, Ghato (TISCO), Now Tata Steel Ltd. At & P.O. – Ghatotand, P.S. Mandu, District … … Hazaribagh. Opposite Party/Appellant Versus
CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
For the Appellant : None : For the Respondents
16 /16.01.2019 Nobody appears on behalf of the appellant in spite of repeated calls.
2. Accordingly, this first appeal is dismissed for nonprosecution.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.)
Mukul
TATA STEEL LTD
KAJRA GANJHU AND OTHERS
ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
