The court dismissed the criminal revision petition as abated, accepting that the petitioner died in 2005.
Petition dismissed as abated due to petitioner's death.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Criminal Revision No. 646 of 2002
Naresh Kumar Gupta … … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. party
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
For the Petitioner : Mr. Anurag Kashyap, Advocate For the State : A.P.P
--5/20.11.2019 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the order of this court a report has been received which transpires that the petitioner died in the year 2005 itself.
The said report is part of the record.
In view of the aforesaid fact, the instant revision application is dismissed as abated.
Let the lower court record be sent to the court concerned forthwith.
(Deepak Roshan, J.)
Amardeep/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a criminal revision petition should be dismissed as abated upon the petitioner's death.
NARESH KUMAR GUPTA
DEEPAK ROSHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
