Dismissed

Dilip Kumar Singh v. the State of Jharkhand through C B I

Jharkhand HC9 Dec 2019Cr.Rev./1256/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Jharkhand disposed off Cr. Revision No. 1256 of 2018 on the petitioner's application to withdraw the revision petition with liberty to raise points before the lower court, which counsel agreed to.

What did the court decide?

Cr. Revision petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to raise all points before the learned court below at appropriate stage.

Dilip Kumar Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Jharkhand HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶2

Cr. Revision No. 1256 of 2018

¶3

Dilip Kumar Singh, aged about 47 years, son of Sri Shiv Darash Singh, Resident of Flat No. 502/B, Vasundhara Garden, Harihar Singh Road, P.O. Morabadi, P.S. Bariatu, District-Ranchi

¶4

… … … Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

… The State of Jharkhand through C.B.I. … Opp. Party ---

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY

¶8

--For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Rajiv Nandan Prasad, Advocate

¶9

¶10

7/09.12.2019

¶11

Heard counsel for the parties.

¶12

This application is directed against the order dated 14.08.2018 passed in R.C. Case No. 10(A)/2010(R) by the learned court of Additional Sessions Judge-VIII-cum-Spl. Judge, CBI, Dhanbad whereby the petition for discharge filed by the petitioner has been rejected in a most mechanical and casual manner and Charge has been directed to be framed against the petitioner, now pending before the learned court of Additional Sessions Judge-VIII-cum-Spl. Judge, CBI, Dhanbad.

¶13

After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to raise all the points taken in this application and the points which may be available under law before the learned court below at appropriate stage.

¶14

Counsel for the CBI has no serious objection to the prayer made.

¶15

Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to raise all the points taken in this application and the points that may be available under law before the learned court below at appropriate stage.

¶16

It is made clear that withdrawal of this case will not prejudice

¶17

the case of either parties before the learned court below.

¶18

Pending I.A, if any, stands dismissed as not pressed.

¶19

Interim order, if any stands vacated.

¶20

Let this order be communicated to the court concerned

¶21

through FAX.

¶22

(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.)

¶23

Binit/

Dilip Kumar Singh v. the State of Jharkhand through C B I

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dilip Kumar Singh v. the State of Jharkhand through C B I

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahendra Nath Singh And Ors. Vs State of Jharkhand

Harjit Singh Arora Alias H S Arora Vs Union Of India Through C B I

MD Alam Vs Tata Steel Ltd. through Its Director Department of Land

M/S Bharat Coking Coal Limited Vs M/S Annapurna Cosntruction

Ram Janam Rawani Vs the State of Jharkhand

T K Bandopadhyay Vs The Union Of India Through C B I