The High Court rendered a criminal appeal infructuous because the appellant was released on remission by the State Sentence Review Board after 15 years of imprisonment, rendering no appearance necessary.
The criminal appeal No.414 of 2005 rendered infructuous and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 414 of 2005
Kandya Munda son of Sahdeo Munda, resident of village Beradih, PS Tamar, Dist.- Ranchi ... ... Appellant
Versus
The State of Jharkhand ... ... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RATNAKER BHENGRA
For the Appellant : None For the State : Mr. Rajesh Kr. Mahtha, APP
Order No. 05/Dated: 05th August, 2019
The sole appellant has challenged the judgment of conviction under section 302 IPC and the order of sentence of R.I for life inflicted upon him in S.T. No.340 of 1996.
Mr. Rajesh Kr. Mahtha, the learned APP tenders a copy of the affidavit dated 05.08.2019 in the Court.
Taken on record.
In this affidavit, Ramayan Ram, ASI, P.S-Tamar has stated that the appellant has now been released, on remission, by virtue of the order of the State Sentence Review Board; the appellant has remained in jail for 15 years 05 months and 06 days including the remission.
No one appears for the appellant.
Accordingly, Cr. Appeal (DB) No.414 of 2005 renders infructuous.
Disposed of, as such.
(Shree Chandrashekhar, J.)
(Ratnaker Bhengra, J.)
R.K.
Kandya Munda
The State of Jharkhand
Shree Chandrashekhar
Ratnaker Bhengra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
