Patras Oraon v. State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal…
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 161 of 1996
With
Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 169 of 1996
Both residents of village Dumardih Tuku Toli, P.S. Gumla,
The State of Bihar (now Jharkhand) ..…. Respondent (in both appeals)
CORAM : Hon’ble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kailash Prasad Deo
For the Appellants: Mr. A.K. Kashyap, Sr. Advocate Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Advocate [in Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 161/1996] Ms. Sunita Kumari, Advocate [in Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 169/1996] For the State: Mr. Sanjay Kr. Srivastava, A.P.P. (Both appeals)
-----
07/07.03.2019 An affidavit has been filed on behalf of the Superintendent of Police, Gumla on 22nd February 2019 in compliance of our order dated 24th January 2019. As per the chart at para-2 containing the status of the appellants, it is indicated that appellant Maikel Oraon alias Maikel Xaxa has died on 28th November 2018. His death certificate is also enclosed. No leave has been sought in terms of Section 394 Cr.P.C. by any legal heir/close relatives of the deceased appellant within 30 days of the death of the appellant, therefore, Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 169 of 1996 abates as respects appellant Maikel Oraon alias Maikel Xaxa.
As per the affidavit of the Superintendent of Police, Gumla, the other two appellants in each of the two appeals are alive. Therefore, the appeals survive as respects the surviving appellants.
( Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.)
(Kailash Prasad Deo, J.)
Shamim/
Vincent Oraon
Antoni Xaxa
Patras Oraon
Maikel Oraon
Alphosh Oraon
The State of Bihar
Aparesh Kumar Singh
Kailash Prasad Deo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court