The High Court of Jharkhand granted the petitioner's request for permission to withdraw the quash-petition (Cr. M.P. No. 48 of 2016) and dismissed the matter as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the petition was granted and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M. P. No. 48 of 2016
Purushottam Das Agarwal ... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand ... ... Opposite Party
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
For the Petitioner : Mr. Praveen Shankar Dayal, Advocate For the State : Mr. R. K. Mishra, APP
06/23.01.2019 After arguing for sometime, Mr. Praveen Shankar Dayal, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this quash-petition.
Permission is granted.
Accordingly, Cr.M.P. No. 48 of 2016 is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Shree Chandrashekhar, J.)
Tanuj/-
Purushottam Das Agarwal
The State of Jharkhand
Shree Chandrashekhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
