Petition for withdrawal in Cr.M.P. No. 429 of 2015. parties had compromised the case. Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn following grant of leave to withdraw.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn; accordingly, the petition is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No. 429 of 2015
…..
Subh Narayan Tewari @ Kanhaiya Tewari, son of Late Ram Naresh Tiwari, Resident of village Udampur, P.O. Udampur, P.S. Raghunathpur, DistrictSiwan (Bihar). …… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand ….. Opposite Party
…..
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH PRASAD DEO
For the Petitioner : Vijay Bahadur Singh, Advocate For the Opp. Party : A.P.P.
…….
11/10.01.2019 It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. Vijay Bahadur Singh that parties have already compromised their case and he does not want to press this petition, as such, the same may be allowed to be withdrawn.
Learned counsel for the State has no objection.
Considering the submissions, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Kailash Prasad Deo, J.)
Pallavi/
Subh Narayan Tewari
The State of Jharkhand
Kailash Prasad Deo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
