Court disposed of a petition quashing a restraint order under Section 144 Cr.P.C., holding that such proceedings cannot involve findings on land title.
Petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. M.P. no.1739 of 2018
Binay Kumar .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Pradeep Kumar Mehta ... Opp. Parties --------CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA
---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Nilendu Kumar, Advocate For the State : -----------
04/Dated:13.05.2019
(Amitav K. Gupta, J.)
Tarun/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a finding on title can be given in proceedings under Section 144 Cr.P.C?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Binay Kumar
The State of Jharkhand
Pradeep Kumar Mehta
Amitav K. Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
