The High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi dismissed the antecedent bail application of the petitioner as withdrawn by the learned counsel.
The anticipated bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 8270 of 2018
Shiv Kumar Mahto … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Nilesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Addl. P.P.
------
Order No.02 Dated- 07.01.2019
The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this anticipatory bail application.
This anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )
Sonu/Gunjan-
Shiv Kumar Mahto
The State of Jharkhand
Anil Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
