The High Court disposed of a revision petition in a civil suit as infructuous since the underlying trial court had already dismissed the suit. No substantive reliefs were granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
C.R. No.71 of 2015
Steel Authority of India Ltd. ..... Petitioner Versus Amar Kumar Harlalka …. Opposite Party
…. Opposite Party
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA
For the Petitioner : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate For the State :
-----
11/2.5.2019 It is submitted that the suit, out of which, this revision petition arises, has been dismissed by the Trial Court below. As such, this revision has become infructuous.
In that view of the matter, this revision petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
(H. C. Mishra, J.)
R.Kumar
Steel Authority of India Ltd.
Amar Kumar Harlalka
H.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
