Krishan Mahto Alias Krishan Kumar Mehta v. the State of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive legal proposition applicable.
Bail application dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive legal proposition applicable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B. A. No. 709 of 2019
Krishan Kumar Mehta @ Krishna Kumar Mehta
@ Krishna Mehta
@ Krishna Mehta ….. …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opp. Party
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA -----For the Petitioner : Mr. Binod Kumar Dubey, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vinay Kumar Tiwary, A.P.P. --------
4/ 01.03.2019 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this bail application. This bail application is accordingly, dismissed as
withdrawn.
( H. C. Mishra, J.)
R.Kr.
Krishan Kumar Mehta
State of Jharkhand
H. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court