Petitioner, acquitted in latehar P.S. case, sought bail. Court noted acquittal made bail application infructuous and dismissed it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 601 of 2019
Bhola Singh ….. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ….. Opp. Party --------CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Lalit Yadav, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P.
--------- 04/Dated: 10/05/2019
Petitioner is accused in Latehar P.S. Case No. 44 of 2007, corresponding to G.R. No. 165 of 2007, registered for the offence under Sections 302/34, 120B of the Indian Penal Code.
In this case, status report was called for.
Perused the report dated 15.04.2019 submitted by Sessions Judge, Latehar, which reveals that charges under Sections 302/34, 120B of the I.P.C. have been framed against the petitioner and the trial ended in acquittal.
Accordingly, this bail application is dismissed as infructuous.
(Anant Bijay Singh, J.)
Sunil/
Bhola Singh
The State of Jharkhand
Anant Bijay Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
