C.M.P. No.431 of 2018 was dismissed because the petitioner failed to appear despite repeated calls, while the opposite parties were represented. No substantive merits were considered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No.431 of 2018
------
M/s New India Assurance Company Ltd.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------ For the Petitioner : None For the Opposite Parties : Mr. Sabal Kr. Laik, Advocate
Order No.04 Dated- 10.05.2019
No one appears on behalf of the petitioner in spite of repeated calls however, Mr. Sabal Kr. Laik, learned counsel for the opposite parties is present.
This C.M.P. stands dismissed for default of the petitioner.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )
Animesh/
M/s New India Assurance Company Ltd.
Manjhli Manjhian
Mina Kumari
Sagen Soren
Rekha Kumari
Inu Kumari
Anil Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
