Anand Alias Anant Tapaswi Vs the State of Jharkhand

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case and have committed no offence as alleged. The story made out by the informant is completely concocted, as no one got injured in the alleged occurrence. No arms/ammunition has been recovered from the possession of the petitioners. The petitioners have been dragged in the present case due to land dispute as has been mentioned by the informant in his written report. The petitioners are in judicial custody since 30^th January, 2019 and as such they may be given the privilege of regular bail.

¶14

Learned APP opposes the petitioners' prayer for bail.

¶15

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners, above named, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (rupees twenty thousand), each, with two sureties of the like amount, each, to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sahibganj, in connection with Borio (J) P.S. Case No.63 of 2015, corresponding to G.R. No.133 of 2015.

¶16

(Rajesh Shankar, J.)

¶17

Sanjay/

Anand Alias Anant Tapaswi v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anand Alias Anant Tapaswi v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bihari Ram Vs the State of Jharkhand

Karim Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand

Asharfi Pandey Vs the State of Jharkhand

Chapta Alias Dhaneshwar Mallah Vs the State of Jharkhand

Santosh Kumar Dey Alias Raju Alias Rajesh Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ritesh Kumar Mandal Alias Ritesh Mandal Vs the State of Jharkhand