Allowed

Beyas Paswan v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC1 Apr 2019A.B.A./302/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a petition for anticipatory bail in a case involving allegations under Section 498A IPC and 3/4 D.P. Act, the High Court granted bail upon deposit of compensation and furnishing a bond, subject to specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted anticipatory bail; directed to deposit Rs. 50,000 as victim compensation and furnish bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties within two months.

Beyas Paswan Vs the State of Jharkhand — Dowry and Cruelty | Jharkhand HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶2

A.B. A. No. 302 of 2019

¶3

Beyas Paswan … Petitioner Versus

¶4

The State of Jharkhand & Anr. … Opposite Parties

¶5

Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶6

For the Petitioner : Mr. A. Khan, Adv. For the State : Addl. P.P. For Opposite Party No. 2 : Mr. R. K. Mishra, Adv.

¶7

05 / 01.04.2019 Heard the parties.

¶8

Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with complaint case no. 246 of 2016 registered under Sections 498A of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 D.P. Act.

¶9

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and those allegations are general and omnibus in nature. It is next submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to pay Rs. 50,000/- as ad interim victim compensation to the complainant without prejudice to his defence and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the complainant in any manner during pendency of the case, hence, the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.

¶10

The learned Addl. PP and learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

¶11

Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Hence, in the event of arrest by the police or surrender within a period of two months from the date of this order, the petitioner shall be released on bail on depositing Rs. 50,000/- by way of demand draft drawn in favour of complainant as ad interim victim compensation and furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lohardaga in connection with complaint case no. 246

¶12

of 2016 subject to the conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.

¶13

In case of depositing aforesaid demand draft by the petitioner, learned court below is directed to issue notice to the complainant and release the demand draft in her favour on proper identification forthwith and the same will be adjusted towards maintenance in any proceeding between the parties in future or the final settlement, if any, takes place between the parties.

¶14

( ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)

¶15

Smita/-

Beyas Paswan v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Beyas Paswan v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Laxmi Charan Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand

Himanshu Sao Vs the State of Jharkhand

Manoj Kumar Vs The State Of Jharkhand Through Vigilance

Sumit Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Rahul Raj Vs the State of Jharkhand

Devendra Prasad Bauri Vs the State of Jharkhand