The High Court of Jharkhand allowed the petitioner's request to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and dismissed it accordingly.
Permission to withdraw the prayer was allowed; the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B. A. No. 2624 of 2019
Mantu Yadav … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Santosh Kumar, Adv. For the State : Addl. P.P.
05 / 04.09.19 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of the court to withdraw this application.
Prayer is allowed.
Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is
dismissed as withdrawn.
( ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Smita/-
Mantu Yadav
The State of Jharkhand
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
