Allowed

Sunil Dhobi Alias Sunil Rajak v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC26 Aug 2019A.B.A./2386/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants anticipatory bail to the petitioner apprehending arrest in a case under the Arms Act. The court fixed conditions including surety amounts, cooperation with investigation, and appearance requirements.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted on deposit of Rs.30,000 cash security and furnishing of bail bond of Rs.25,000 with two sureties of Rs.25,000 each; release if arrested within four weeks.

Sunil Dhobi Alias Sunil Rajak Vs the State of Jharkhand — Cheque Dishonour | Jharkhand HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶2

A.B.A. No. 2386 of 2019

¶3

Sunil Dhobi @ Sunil Rajak … Petitioner

¶4

Versus

¶5

… The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party ------

¶6

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Kashyap, Sr. Advocate For the State : Mr. S.K. Keshri, Addl. P.P.

¶7

------

¶8

Order No.03 Dated- 26.08.2019

¶9

Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Patratu P.S. Case No.328 of 2018 registered under sections 25(1B)A/26/35 of the Arms Act.

¶10

Heard the parties.

¶11

The learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner files a supplementary affidavit. Keep the same in the record.

¶12

The Learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that from the possession of the co-accused person two live cartridges and one .9mm pistol have been recovered and the co-accused has disclosed the name of the petitioner to be the person who succeeded in fleeing away from the place of occurrence. It is next submitted by the learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner that the allegation against the petitioner are false and except the confessional statement of the co-accused, there is no material to implicate the petitioner in this case. It is next submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to furnish sufficient security including cash security and undertake to cooperate with the investigation of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.

¶13

Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.

¶14

Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the above named petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the date of this order, he shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs.30,000/- and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate -1^st Class, Ramgarh, in connection with Patratu P.S. Case No.328 of 2018 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.

¶15

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )

¶16

Sonu-

Sunil Dhobi Alias Sunil Rajak v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil Dhobi Alias Sunil Rajak v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjay Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Avinash Kumar Gupta Vs the State of Jharkhand

Banti Lohar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ashok Prasad Vs the State of Jharkhand

Parwez Alam Vs the State of Jharkhand

Sarita Devi Vs the State of Jharkhand