Suresh Prasad v. the State of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.1503 of…
COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.1503 of…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.1503 of 2019
Suresh Prasad
..... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
…. Opposite Party
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA
For the Petitioner : Md. Azam, Advocate For the State : A. P.P. -----
6/2.5.2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has been made accused for the offences under Sections 304-B / 34 of the Indian Penal Code, and Sections 3 / 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, in connection with Barkatha P.S. Case No.32 of 2011, corresponding to G.R. No.765 of 2011, S.T. No.225 of 2014.
Petitioner is the husband of the deceased, and there being direct allegation against the petitioner and the other in-laws to have subjected the deceased to cruelty and torture for demand of dowry and to have committed her dowry death, earlier bail applications of the petitioner were rejected twice on merits.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has renewed the prayer for bail.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, prayer for bail stands rejected.
(H. C. Mishra, J.)
R.Kumar
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be released on bail in a case involving dowry death and cruelty charges.
Suresh Prasad
The State of Jharkhand
H.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court