In W.P.(C) No.886 of 2010, the High Court of Jharkhand dismissed the petitioners writ petition, declining to interfere in a partition suit where amendment to written statement was denied over eight years later with no stay order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(C) No.886 of 2010
Both sons of Late Budhu Mandal, residents of village Danro, PO & PS-Ramgarh, Sub Division and District Dumka
…..... Petitioners
-Versus-
------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
For the Petitioners : Mr. Kumar Vaibhav, Adv. For the Respondents : ------
04/18.04.2018 The petitioners are aggrieved of order dated 10.11.2009 by which amendment in the written statement filed in Title (Partition) Suit No.13 of 1998 has been declined.
2
(Shree Chandrashekhar, J.)
sudhir
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with an order declining amendment to written statement in a pending partition suit.
Bhushan Mandal
Ganesh Mandal
Kalsharia Mandal
Kamali Mandalain
Subha Mandalain
Chania Mandalain
SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
