Petitioner failed to appear for the hearing after multiple adjournments. The court dismissed the writ petition as being dropped for non-prosecution.
The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P (S) No. 5032 of 2010
Smt.Shanati Gorethi Tigga Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand & Ors. Respondents
---
Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMATH PATNAIK
For the Petitioners/Appellant: None For the Respondents : Mr.Arpan Mishra, Advocate
Dated : 14th February, 2018
None appears for the petitioners. However, JC to GP IV appears on behalf of respondent-State and Mr.Ajay Sinha, JC to Mr.S.K.Ughal on behalf of the respondent no.4 and 5.
On 07.02.2018, none appeared for the petitioner. To give one more indulgene to the petitioner, the matter was adjourned today and today also, none appeared for the petitioner on repeated calls. It appears that the petitioner has lost her interest in prosecuting the case. This petition is, thus, dimissed for nonprosecution.
(Pramath Patnaik,J.)
dey
Smt.Shanati Gorethi Tigga
The State of Jharkhand
Pramath Patnaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
