Petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition. Permission was accorded by the single judge. The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition is accorded. Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(C) No. 1495 of 2017
M/S Katyani Coke & Minerals, through its partner, Dinesh Kumar, Ramgarh
….. Petitioners
Versus The State of Jharkhand & Others ….. Respondents
----- CORAM
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
For the Petitioner: Mr. Shashi Bhushan Sah For the State: Mr. A.C to A.G
06/11.12.2018 Mr. Shashi Bhushan Sah, A.C to Mr. Sidhartha Roy, learned counsel for
the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition.
Learned counsel for the State has no objection. Permission is accorded.
The Present writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
Satish/-
(RAJESH SHANKAR, J)
M/S Katyani Coke & Minerals
The State of Jharkhand
RAJESH SHANKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
