Criminal revision application dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear on the hearing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Rev No. 841 of 2014
Tapas Kumar Roy. .…..Petitioner
Versus
Coram: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
----- For the Petitioner : None. For the State : APP. For O.P. Nos. 2 and 3 : Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate
05/28.8.2018 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner.
However, Mr. Manish Kumar, learned counsel for the O.P. Nos. 2 and 3, is
present.
This application stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay,J)
Rakesh/
Tapas Kumar Roy
The State of Jharkhand
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
